The Inequalities of Plastic Waste - Who Should Pay?

Every year, the world produces almost 370 million tonnes of plastic. The UK produces more plastic waste per person than all other countries in the world, bar the USA, equating to 5.2 million tonnes every year - enough to fill Wembley Stadium six times over! With many of us rinsing, sorting and separating our plastics from our cardboards, we naturally assume that our recycling will be taken to a processing plant to be recycled and reused – but is that really the case?

Well, according to the latest government stats, it is. The government claims that the UK recycles 70% of all packaging waste including plastic, however, on closer inspection it is revealed that targets are being almost exclusively met by the exporting of waste to other nations such as Malaysia and Turkey. In 2020, 688,000 tonnes of plastic packaging waste was exported from the UK, this is a daily average of just under 2000 tonnes of waste. This pattern is mirrored in other high-income countries, such as the USA, who are also guilty of exporting tonnes of contaminated plastic waste. This exploitative practice is termed ‘Waste Colonialism’, a concept formally introduced in 1989 by the UN.

Destination countries, not only lack the capacity to process the waste from overseas, but also lack adequate infrastructure to manage their own waste and recycling requirements. In many cases the plastic exported for ‘recycling’ is burnt, fly-tipped or just left to pile up until sites are full.

pexels-photo-2768961.jpeg

The frequent illegal export of waste, as well as the wide scale prevalence of illegal dumpsites is curbing environmental health, social well-being, and economic development in destination countries. The stats are shocking. With every 30 seconds that pass the UK throws away 2 double-decker busloads of plastic waste, 30 double-decker busloads of plastic waste are burned or dumped in developing countries and 1 person dies from diseases caused by mismanaged waste.

Many of us are aware of the environmental implications of plastic waste – with devastating images of turtles entangled in 'six pack' holders widely publicised, but when it comes to the human health impacts we are left in the dark. Plastic pollution is creating a growing public health emergency around the world, and the shifting of the burden of plastic waste to other countries means that these impacts are disproportionately felt by low income and vulnerable communities. At least 30 diseases can be associated with mismanaged waste, of which plastic is a growing element. Research by Tearfund suggests that between 400,000 and 1 million people die each year in low- and middle-income countries because of illness related to mismanaged waste. At the upper end, that is one person every 30 seconds. 

Mismanaged waste, including plastics, impacts the health of individuals in developing countries in several ways; the open burning of waste releases cancer-causing pollutants and when waste is left in dumps it creates breeding grounds for mosquitoes, flies and vermin which spread diseases such as malaria and rabies. Mismanaged plastic blocks waterways and drainage systems resulting in flooding and the spread of waterborne diseases, while also polluting water and soil with microplastics and increasing incidences of diarrhoeal diseases for people living among mismanaged waste. This impact on human health results in a societal cost of £11.9 billion at the lower end and £29.9 billion at the upper end, in terms of loss of life.

In recent years the push back from nations that have historically accepted UK waste, has increased the pressure on the government to update waste infrastructure and innovate. The proposed introduction of the Extended Producer Responsibility reform (EPR) is set for 2023 and is pushing for the responsibility and accountability to be placed on manufacturers and retailers for the entire life cycle of a product, from supply chain to end-product. This is an example of how a single regulatory event can potentially ‘internalise’ part of the external cost (i.e. become a ‘real’ financial cost to a company). The proposed introduction of EPR scheme provides a key opportunity to implement charges that discourage companies from producing non-recyclable packaging and incentivise them to switch to reusable and refillable options. This could make a real difference, as Greenpeace estimates that reducing single-use plastic by 50% would allow the UK to end waste exports, as well as significantly reducing the amount of plastic going into incineration and landfill.

The EPR is one of several potential regulatory instruments which could ‘internalise’ the cost, but the ‘levers’ are not always regulatory – customer boycotts in certain countries are another example of how societal costs can ultimately be transferred to companies (e.g. reduced sales). Route2 routinely undertakes scenario analysis to construct internalisation pathways for its clients … but the starting point is always to first understand their physical impacts (waste, water, pollutants, emissions, modern slavery etc), and then the economic (wider societal) cost of these impacts. This provides a new lens on materiality and the platform from which companies can be better prepared for future operating landscapes. 

Route2 delivers unique insights into the total impact of business activities. We offer businesses expert advice and analysis about historical and future performance. Our services (coined Value2Society) strengthen decision making, establish competitive advantage and enhance the value business delivers to society. 

To find out more, email us at info@route2.com or phone +44 (0) 208 878 3941  

Follow our social media to never miss a post:

Featured
The Inequalities of Plastic Waste - Who Should Pay?
The Inequalities of Plastic Waste - Who Should Pay?

Every year, the world produces almost 370 million tonnes of plastic. The UK produces more plastic waste per person than all other countries in the world, bar the USA, equating to 5.2 million tonnes every year - enough to fill Wembley Stadium six times over! With many of us rinsing, sorting and separating our plastics from our cardboards, we naturally assume that our recycling will be taken to a processing plant to be recycled and reused – but is that really the case?

Rethinking the Restoration of Nature
Rethinking the Restoration of Nature

There is an increasing division between nature and wilderness. Perfectly manicured gardens and heavily regulated reserves may represent elements of nature, however, can something so regulated really be described as wild?

Fashion - But At What Cost?
Fashion - But At What Cost?

While for many of us modern slavery is a concept which has been consigned to history, for millions it remains a reality. Modern slavery refers to situations of exploitation that a person cannot refuse or leave because of threats, violence, coercion, deception, and/or abuse of power. According to the International Labour Organisation, 40 million individuals worldwide are subject to modern slavery every single day.

Human Rights - Going Beyond Minimum Safeguards
Human Rights - Going Beyond Minimum Safeguards

When analysing the recent EU regulations on sustainable finance, a recurring and converging theme can be observed alongside the focus on climate and environment – this is human rights due diligence. Human rights due diligence is a way for corporates and investors to proactively manage any potential human rights impacts, within which they are involved.

The Protectors of Our Planet
The Protectors of Our Planet

There are approximately 476 million people who self-identify as indigenous worldwide. Although the indigenous population makes up less than 5% of the world’s total population, they own, occupy or use up to 22% of the global land area, which includes 80% of the world’s biodiversity. For thousands of years indigenous communities have been caretakers of the environment, protecting land from degradation and respecting wildlife; a role which is often overlooked

Into the Blue
Into the Blue

Worldwide, phytoplankton transfers about 10 billion tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere to the deep ocean each year. Based on Route2’s preferred social cost of carbon of £61, this results in a yearly societal benefit of £610 billion, in terms of avoided carbon. This indicates the significance and value of phytoplankton within the ocean sink, therefore, improving the capacity and efficacy of this is a priority for sustainability and conservation.

Making Peace with Nature
Making Peace with Nature

What is more valuable, a tree, or its equivalent weight in paper? Is a lake as valuable as its volume in water bottles on supermarket shelves?

The majority of us would not know how to approach an answer to this question. The only form of value we are accustomed to seeing, and therefore the value lens we see the world through, is financial value. Our vision is incomplete, we are colour-blind and all we see is money.

Pollinators Against Pesticides
Pollinators Against Pesticides

Across the world around two million tonnes of pesticides are being used annually, with approximately 85% of all pesticide usage occurring in the agricultural industry. Agriculture uses pesticides to boost productivity and output by controlling for weeds, preventing insect infestations and reducing plant diseases. However, it has been predicted that the costs of pesticides now outweigh the benefits.

Regenerative Farming; A Solution to Save our Soil
Regenerative Farming; A Solution to Save our Soil

Agriculture in developed nations is consolidated around industrial, largescale farms. These farms, which will often grow a limited range of crops or even a single crop (also known as ‘monoculture’), are increasingly responsible for the food that we eat. The advantages of a largescale farm are commonly assumed to be self-evident: consistency of output and economies of scale.

One Giant Cost for Mankind
One Giant Cost for Mankind

Water on the moon looks to be more abundant and accessible than previously thought, which is good news for all those considering a future lunar economy. Lunar water offers the potential of lunar manufactured rocket fuel, which means more efficient space exploration of other heavenly bodies. But before we view the solar system as the next wild west it might be worth reminding ourselves of the real costs of ‘freedom in the commons’ and ensure this understanding shapes our celestial adventures.

Ania Kurzawinska